Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 1.16, Δ 0.10).
- Aldosivi fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Banfield held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 221Lead | Accurate passes | 152 |
| 314Lead | Total passes | 239 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.30 | Goals prevented | 0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.