Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (14% on target vs 0%).
- Aldosivi held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 | Shots off target |
| 8 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 236 | Total passes | 450Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.