Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (18 vs 4 shots).
- Gimnasia L.P.
- was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Gimnasia L.p. |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead |
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Gimnasia L.p. |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 255Lead | Accurate passes | 105 |
| 343Lead | Total passes | 199 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Gimnasia L.p. |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Gimnasia L.p. |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Gimnasia L.p. |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.