Match statistics snapshot
- Huracan fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Huracan was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
- Huracan held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 10Lead |
| 7 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 140 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 209 | Total passes | 422Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |