Match statistics snapshot
- Huracan created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.21, Δ 0.26).
- Banfield fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 326Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.40 | Goals prevented | 0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.