Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Huracan was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
- Huracan held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 427Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |