Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Instituto Cordoba was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 309Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 400Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.