Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 2.50, Δ 1.08).
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Instituto Cordoba was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.50Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 277Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 364Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.22 | Goals prevented | 0.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Instituto Cordoba |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.