Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus created the clearer chances on xG (0.33 vs 1.20, Δ 0.87).
- Banfield fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Lanus was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 66%Lead |
| 137 | Accurate passes | 215Lead |
| 228 | Total passes | 326Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.06 | Goals prevented | 0.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |