Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield created the clearer chances on xG (2.75 vs 1.43, Δ 1.32).
- Banfield fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Newells Old Boys was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 2.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 137 | Accurate passes | 274Lead |
| 187 | Total passes | 353Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.31 | Goals prevented | 0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.