Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 20%).
- Banfield held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 179Lead | Accurate passes | 152 |
| 259Lead | Total passes | 224 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Newells Old Boys |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |