Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Racing Club was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 414 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.