Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 1.25, Δ 0.09).
- Racing Club fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 327Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.53 | Goals prevented | -0.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.