Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 2.42, Δ 0.91).
- Banfield fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Racing Club was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.42Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 259 | Total passes | 396Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |