Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Club was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 18%).
- Racing Club held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 183 | Accurate passes | 304Lead |
| 275 | Total passes | 391Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Racing Club |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.