Match statistics snapshot
- Sarmiento Junin created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.42, Δ 0.08).
- Sarmiento Junin fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 264 | Accurate passes | 275Lead |
| 346Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.