Match statistics snapshot
- Sarmiento Junin created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 2.24, Δ 0.44).
- Banfield fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.24Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 177 | Accurate passes | 301Lead |
| 246 | Total passes | 387Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.61 | Goals prevented | -0.61 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Sarmiento Junin |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |