Match statistics snapshot
- Tigre created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 1.05, Δ 0.27).
- Banfield fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Tigre held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Banfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Banfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Banfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Banfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.39 | Goals prevented | 0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Banfield | Statistic | Tigre |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.