Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 0.18, Δ 0.18).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnet | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 4Lead |
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnet | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 49% | Pass accuracy | 51%Lead |
| 147Lead | Accurate passes | 146 |
| 298Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnet | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnet | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnet | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.