Match statistics snapshot
- Crawley Town created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 2.94, Δ 0.53).
- Barnet fired more attempts (21 vs 19 shots).
- Barnet held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnet | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.94Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 19 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnet | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 61%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 189Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 308Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnet | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnet | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnet | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |