Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet created the clearer chances on xG (3.00 vs 1.05, Δ 1.95).
- Barnet fired more attempts (23 vs 4 shots).
- Barnet held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnet | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnet | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 423Lead | Total passes | 264 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnet | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnet | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnet | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |