Match statistics snapshot
- Oldham created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 1.50, Δ 0.02).
- Oldham fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Barnet was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 56%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnet | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnet | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 64%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 184Lead | Accurate passes | 154 |
| 288Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnet | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnet | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnet | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |