Match statistics snapshot
- Barnet created the clearer chances on xG (2.96 vs 2.38, Δ 0.58).
- Barnet fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Salford City was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnet | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.38 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnet | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 48% |
| 323Lead | Accurate passes | 108 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 224 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnet | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnet | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnet | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.