Match statistics snapshot
- Barnsley fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 271Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 391Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |