Match statistics snapshot
- Barnsley fired more attempts (23 vs 22 shots).
- Barnsley was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 23%).
- Barnsley held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 22 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barnsley | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |