Match statistics snapshot
- Barracas Central created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 0.55, Δ 1.79).
- Barracas Central was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 18%).
- Aldosivi held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barracas Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barracas Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 427Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barracas Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barracas Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.38 | Goals prevented | -0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barracas Central | Statistic | Aldosivi |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.