Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Barrow was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Barrow held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 288Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 421Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |