Match statistics snapshot
- Barrow fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 313Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 427Lead | Total passes | 422 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barrow | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |