Match statistics snapshot
- Cambridge United created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.46, Δ 0.66).
- Cambridge United fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Cambridge United was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barrow | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barrow | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 369Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 349 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barrow | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barrow | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barrow | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.