Match statistics snapshot
- Barrow fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Barrow was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
- Barrow held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barrow | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 1 |
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barrow | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 55%Lead | Pass accuracy | 45% |
| 198Lead | Accurate passes | 130 |
| 359Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barrow | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barrow | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 8 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barrow | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.