Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.22 vs 1.08, Δ 0.86).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Barrow | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Barrow | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 267Lead | Accurate passes | 148 |
| 385Lead | Total passes | 269 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Barrow | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Barrow | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Barrow | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.