Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.51 vs 2.01, Δ 0.50).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Başakşehir | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Başakşehir | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 249 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Başakşehir | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Başakşehir | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.57 | Goals prevented | -0.57 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Başakşehir | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.