Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Chicago Red Stars W was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 38%).
- Chicago Red Stars W held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 343Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Chicago Red Stars W |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |