Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Thorns W fired more attempts (5 vs 1 shots).
- Portland Thorns W was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 0%).
- Bay FC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 1Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 83Lead | Accurate passes | 66 |
| 107Lead | Total passes | 84 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Fouls | 4 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |