Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Bay FC was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 234Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 326Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bay Fc | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |