Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (2.31 vs 2.59, Δ 0.28).
- Bayern München fired more attempts (23 vs 12 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bayern München | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.59Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bayern München | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 604Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 675Lead | Total passes | 229 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bayern München | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bayern München | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.91 | Goals prevented | -0.91 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bayern München | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |