Match statistics snapshot
- Beerschot VA fired more attempts (25 vs 8 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 397 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 466 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |