Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 2.76, Δ 1.39).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- Beerschot VA was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.76Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 278 | Accurate passes | 452Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.03 | Goals prevented | 0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |