Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 1.74, Δ 0.33).
- Beerschot VA fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 12%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.70 | Goals prevented | -0.70 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beerschot Va | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.