Match statistics snapshot
- Chengdu Better City created the clearer chances on xG (0.60 vs 1.34, Δ 0.74).
- Chengdu Better City fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.60 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 321Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 401 | Total passes | 401 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.