Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 0.78, Δ 0.29).
- Hangzhou Greentown fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 451Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 506Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| Yellow cards |