Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 0.91, Δ 0.71).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 499Lead | Accurate passes | 200 |
| 579Lead | Total passes | 282 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |