Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 1.13, Δ 0.55).
- Qingdao Jonoon fired more attempts (8 vs 7 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 288 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.