Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (4.41 vs 0.11, Δ 4.30).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (39 vs 3 shots).
- Shandong Luneng was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 4.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.11 |
| Offsides | ||
| 29Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 39Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 511Lead | Accurate passes | 115 |
| 560Lead | Total passes | 182 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |