Match statistics snapshot
- Tianjin Teda created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.66, Δ 0.22).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Beijing Guoan was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.66Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 384 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 441 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |