Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (1.94 vs 1.13, Δ 0.81).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 587Lead | Accurate passes | 146 |
| 658Lead | Total passes | 219 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beijing Guoan | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.