Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Hapoel Beer Sheva was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Hapoel Beer Sheva |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Hapoel Beer Sheva |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 340 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 415 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Hapoel Beer Sheva |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Hapoel Beer Sheva |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Hapoel Beer Sheva |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.