Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Haifa fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Maccabi Haifa was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 17%).
- Maccabi Haifa held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 286 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 425Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.