Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Maccabi Haifa was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 42%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 421Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.