Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Haifa fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 13%).
- Maccabi Haifa held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 129 | Accurate passes | 406Lead |
| 216 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Haifa |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.